<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rdf:RDF xml:base="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
 <channel rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/taxonomy/term/1/0">
  <title>tea - Smog, Climate Change and Energy</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/taxonomy/term/1/0</link>
  <description>
Smog, Climate Change and Energy
</description>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <items>
   <rdf:Seq>
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/news_release_oct_31/07" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/newsrelease_aug_01_07" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/newsreleasejuly16_07" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/340" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/smogrelease06" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/308" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/307" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/296" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/290" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/288" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/277" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/165" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/107" />
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/31" />
   </rdf:Seq>
  </items>
 </channel>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/news_release_oct_31/07">
  <title>Toronto Gets a C+ for Fighting Smog</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/news_release_oct_31/07</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body style="visibility: visible;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;For Immediate Release                                                                                                         Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â Â Â  Â &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        October 31, 2007&lt;/b&gt;</description>
  <dc:date>2007-10-31T07:29:48Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/newsrelease_aug_01_07">
  <title>NEW REPORT SAYS GREEN ENERGY PLAN CHEAPEST WAY TO KEEP LIGHTS ON IN ONTARIO</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/newsrelease_aug_01_07</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body style="visibility: visible;"&gt;&lt;p /&gt;&lt;p /&gt;&lt;p /&gt;&lt;p /&gt;&lt;p /&gt;&lt;p /&gt;&lt;p /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wednesday, August 1, 2007&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p /&gt;&lt;p /&gt;&lt;p&gt;Earlier today, WWF Canada and Pembina Institute released an important new report showing that an energy plan focusing on renewables and energy conservation is the  cheaper, cleaner and less risky way to keep the lights on in Ontario.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Called â€œRenewable is Doable,ï¿½? this comprehensive report compares the green energy plan to the Ontario governmentâ€™s current plan to build nuclear power stations and keep coal stations on line until at least 2014. The Renewable is Doable Plan is cheaper, cleaner and less risky.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; EA joins WWF Canada and Pembina Institute in supporting Renewable is Doable. We urge Ontarians to ask provincial candidates to support this plan as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Below is the press release issued by the groups and a link to the report.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;WWF-Canada-Renewable Is Doable: Re-Analysis of Government's Own Data Shows Ontario Can Keep the Lights on Without Coal or Nuclear&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwire - Aug. 1, 2007) - A cheaper, cleaner, and less risky option than the current nuclear-reliant Ontario electricity plan, is doable, according to a state-of-the-art modelling analysis commissioned by WWF-Canada and the Pembina Institute and released today.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Ontario can keep the lights on while saving consumers money and cutting greenhouse gases in half,&amp;quot; said Cherise Burda, Ontario Policy Director with the Pembina Institute. &amp;quot;This study shows in vivid detail that there is a cheaper, safer, and greener way to power our future.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The analysis shows that reducing unnecessary energy waste, switching to renewable energy, and recycling waste heat from industrial and commercial operations into electricity will cost consumers less than building new nuclear plants. It also cuts future greenhouse gases from electricity generation in half.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;This study comes on the heels of an Environics poll released this week, which shows that Ontarians overwhelmingly (76%) favour shifting to renewable power and conservation. &amp;quot;Renewable is Doable. This is the plan that Ontarians want,&amp;quot; said Keith Stewart of WWF-Canada. &amp;quot;We can put an end to smoggy coal without forcing Ontarians to reluctantly accept more expensive nuclear plants and another generation of radioactive waste.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The analysis, conducted using an advanced computer simulation of Ontario's electrical system, uses data from the Ontario Power Authority (OPA), cross-referenced with comparable energy efficiency and renewable energy project performance in the U.S. and Europe. It found that greener energy options can:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;-      Meet Ontario's growing appetite for electricity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-      Reduce costs to consumers by 11% against the Ontario Power Authority's Preliminary Plan.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-      Cut in half the greenhouse gases that would be emitted by the OPA plan over the next 20 years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-      Phase out coal by 2012 at the latest, whereas a nuclear-based plan commits Ontario to burning coal until 2017.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <dc:date>2007-08-07T04:45:56Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/newsreleasejuly16_07">
  <title>News Release</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/newsreleasejuly16_07</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body style="visibility: visible;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;July 16, 2007&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For Immediate Release&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Provincial Export of Dirty Electricity to U.S. in 2006&lt;br /&gt;Responsible for 130 Ontario Deaths &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Toronto: New information released today reveals that provincially-owned Ontario Power Generationâ€™s (OPGâ€™s) exporting of dirty, coal-fired electricity to the United States was responsible for up to 130 unnecessary fatalities in Ontario. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; â€œNew analysis of government information by the Ontario Clean Air Alliance (OCAA) reveals that in 2006 selling dirty electricity to the U.S. was responsible for an estimated 130 deaths in Ontario, about 200 hospital admissions and approximately 65,000 other illnesses such as asthma attacks,&amp;quot; said Dr. Hilary de Veber, a hospital-based Pediatrician working in Toronto's East End and Board Member of the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; â€œI canâ€™t figure out why the Premier is allowing this to happen,&amp;quot; commented Dr. Hartmann, Executive Director of the Toronto Environmental Alliance. â€œHe knows that the pollution from coal-fired electricity kills Ontarians. He knows that the City of Toronto is actively trying to reduce smog and cut greenhouse gas emissions here in Toronto. Yet, he allows OPG, which is completely owned by the Government of Ontario, to produce dirty, deadly electricity not to keep the lights on, but to export it to the U.S. to make a buck. Itâ€™s unbelievable and, frankly, completely irresponsible.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Additional information released by the Ontario Clean Air Alliance (OCAA) notes that OPGâ€™s profits from its coal-fired electricity exports in 2006 was about $100 million. â€œIf this â€˜profitâ€™ were given to electricity customers, it would reduce our monthly bills by about 77 cents,&amp;quot; said Jack Gibbons, Chair of the OCAA. â€œEveryone I know would rather save 130 lives than save 77 cents a month on their hydro bill.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The good news is that the solution is simple: â€œPremier McGuinty simply needs to keep his 2003 election promise and ban non-emergency coal-fired electricity exports to the United States. We should only export or import coal-fired electricity if it is absolutely necessary to keep the lights on in the U.S. or Ontario,&amp;quot; said Mr. Gibbons. &lt;br /&gt;-30-&lt;br /&gt;For more information, contact:  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Franz Hartmann, Executive Director, Toronto Environmental Alliance; Cell: 416-606-8881&lt;br /&gt;Jack Gibbons, Chair, Ontario Clean Air Alliance; 416-926-1907 ext. 240 &lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <dc:date>2007-07-16T09:32:57Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/340">
  <title>Clean Air Act Press Release</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/340</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;
&lt;body style="visibility: visible;"&gt;&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;img width="122" height="141" src="/image/view/238" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align="left"&gt;FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE&lt;br /&gt;October 19, 2006&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align="left"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <dc:date>2006-10-19T07:37:56Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/smogrelease06">
  <title>TEA Releases 2006 Smog Report Card</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/smogrelease06</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body style="visibility: visible;"&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;img width="141" height="166" src="/image/view/238" /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;October 10, 2006&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For Immediate Release&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Press Conference&lt;br /&gt;City Hall  Committee Room #4&lt;br /&gt;10:30 a.m. &lt;br /&gt;October 10, 2006&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <dc:date>2006-10-10T11:32:06Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/308">
  <title>Four Days Inadequate for Public Review of 83 Billion Dollar Electricity Plan</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/308</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body style="VISIBILITY: visible"&gt;&lt;p&gt;February 8, 2006&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Media Release&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Environmental groups today registered their outrage and disappointment with the McGuinty government’s plan for public consultation on the proposed long-term electricity supply mix. As of next Monday, the public will have a meagre four days to comment on the $83 billion plan.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <dc:date>2006-02-08T11:03:16Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/307">
  <title>10-Point Port Lands Green Energy Plan</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/307</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Port Lands Green Energy Plan —&lt;br /&gt;More than 750 Mega Watts of Power&lt;br /&gt;Report of the Expert Panel&lt;br /&gt;January 5, 2006&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In response to the Province’s proposal to site a large scale, 500 to 650</description>
  <dc:date>2006-11-28T05:49:36Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/296">
  <title>TEA asks you to support Climate Action Now</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/296</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body style="visibility: visible;"&gt;

&lt;div class="Section1"&gt;

&lt;p align="center" class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 18pt; font-family: Verdana;"&gt;Climate Action Now! &lt;o:p /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <dc:date>2005-11-10T07:25:44Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/290">
  <title>TEA calls for energy conservation, not nukes</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/290</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body style="visibility: visible;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-US"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-US"&gt; October 14, 2005&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On Electricity,
McGuinty should learn from Schwarzenegger: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;o:p /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;st1:state w:st="on"&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-US"&gt;California&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/st1:state&gt;&lt;span lang="EN-US"&gt; to Conserve 1500 MW and net savings of US $2.7
billion while &lt;st1:state w:st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place w:st="on"&gt;Ontario&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:state&gt;
to Spend over $2
billion rebuilding old nukes&lt;o:p /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
to generate the same amount of power</description>
  <dc:date>2005-10-14T04:01:12Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/288">
  <title>TEA Releases Smog Report Card 2005</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/288</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body style="visibility: visible;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;October 6, 2005&lt;/p&gt; &lt;font size="4"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;City of Toronto Gets “C-” on Smog Report Card: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;City’s Smog Actions Inadequate&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <dc:date>2005-10-06T03:42:54Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/277">
  <title>Toronto has 40th smog day of 2005</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/277</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;body style="visibility: visible;"&gt;



&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;body style="visibility: visible;"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;p&gt;August 10, 2005&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;Toronto has 40th Smog Day: Group Releases list of Why We're so Smoggy &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <dc:date>2005-10-06T03:47:29Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/165">
  <title>Electricity Price Hikes Will Hit Poor Hardest</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/165</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body style="visibility: visible;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;TORONTO- Today, the Low-Income Energy Network (LIEN) called on the provincial government to introduce province-wide energy conservation and bill assistance programs for low-income households in response to the announcement of higher prices for electricity. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <dc:date>2005-03-11T05:02:32Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/107">
  <title>Growing number of households caught in Ontario energy crisis</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/107</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
(January 20, 2005) As electricity rates increase, a growing number of
the hundreds of thousands of low-income households in Ontario are at
risk of losing their homes this winter. The Low-Income Energy Network
(LIEN) has designed an energy conservation program to protect
low-income consumers from unaffordable energy bills this heating season.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <dc:date>2005-06-15T10:37:38Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
 <item rdf:about="http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/31">
  <title>City of Toronto Gets 'B+' on Smog Report Card</title>
  <link>http://www.torontoenvironment.org/node/31</link>
  <description>
&lt;html&gt;&lt;head&gt;&lt;/head&gt;&lt;body style="visibility: visible;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Toronto) Today, the Toronto 
        Environmental Alliance gave the City of Toronto a grade of 'B+' in the 
        seventh annual Smog Report Card, the City's highest grade to date. The 
        new Mayor and Council earned high marks for the $35 million energy efficiency 
        program, buying bio-fuels and hybrid vehicles, decisive action on the 
        Island Airport and the St. Clair streetcar right-of-way, and for passing 
        the tree bylaw.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <dc:date>2005-06-15T11:23:03Z</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>Smog, Climate Change and Energy</dc:subject>
 </item>
</rdf:RDF>
